Skip to content

Essay on Particular Redemption at Westminister

January 11, 2008

Marty sent me a link to a fellow who has written this outstanding essay on the debates on the atonement at Westminster.

Shades of opinion within a generic Calvinism: The Particular Redemption Debate at the Westminster Assembly

Download the pdf.

This essay is very good. It is bound to change the way many have portrayed so-called Amyraldian theology and the Westminster standards. The treatment of Ussher is fascinating and reinforces the reference Mitchell makes.

I have a few quibbles. For example, he closes out with this remark:

As Moore comments, this lends credence to the thesis that it was “the universal redemptionists who availed themselves most of scholastic distinctions, whereas it was the strict particular redemptionists who upheld an Augustinian simplicity in their soteriology.

Moore is just so way off-base on this. There never was an uncomplex Augustinian doctrine of redemption until it started getting “smoothed” out by some in the later 16thC.

David

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: